Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Miller v. La Rosa
510 U.S. 1109
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1994-02-22
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- refusing to find individual supervisors personally liable under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a and ADEA
- “individual defendants cannot be held liable for damages under Title VII” or “suits under the ADEA”
- “... it is inconceivable that Congress intended to allow civil liability to run against individual employees”
- liability cannot lie against individuals under either Title VII or the ADEA
- “[I]t is unlikely that Congress intended to impose personal liability on supervisors.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Miller v. La Rosa. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 18 opinions
Miller
v.
La Rosa et al.
No. 93-659.
Supreme Court of United States.
February 22, 1994.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 991 F. 2d 583.