Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Dade v. Cannatella
506 U.S. 825
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1992-10-05
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- upholding state law requiring point-of-sale warnings even though state could not regulate labels themselves
- preemption clause in FHSA leaves cautionary labeling to the federal government while allowing states to regulate the sale and use of dangerous chemicals
- state statute requiring point-of-sale warnings not preempted
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Dade v. Cannatella. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 21 opinions
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Denied.