Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Greenberg v. H & H Music Co.
506 U.S. 981
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1992-11-09
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- recognizing specific intent to interfere with a specific plaintiff’s benefits as an element of a § 510 claim
- approving Sixth Circuit’s comments in Musto v. American General Corp., 861 F.2d 897, 912 (6th Cir.1988)(“rejecting challenge to an employer’s freedom to choose the terms of its employee pension plan”
- approving Sixth Circuit’s comments in Musto v. American General Corp., 861 F.2d 897, 912 (6th Cir.1988)(“rejecting challenge to an employer’s freedom to choose the terms of its employee pension plan”), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1020, 109 S.Ct. 1745, 104 L.Ed.2d 182 (1989
- “ERISA does not broadly prevent an employer from ‘discriminating’ in the creation, alteration or termination of employee-benefit plans”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Greenberg v. H & H Music Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 11 opinions
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Blackmun and Justice O’Connor would grant certiorari.