Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Cromwell v. Equicor-Equitable HCA Corp.

Cromwell v. Equicor-Equitable HCA Corp., 505 U.S. 1233 (1992)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1992-07-22
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • stating that such payments would “affect the relationship between plan principals by extending coverage beyond the terms of the plan”
  • colleeting cases wherein state claims for breach of contract, promissory estoppel, negligence and misrepresentation of benefits were preempted by ERISA
  • collecting cases wherein state claims for breach of contract, promissory estoppel, negligence and misrepresentation of benefits were preempted by ERISA
  • finding preemption where health care provider sued plan administrator seeking recovery of plan benefits
  • “We are aware that preemption normally is not dependent on the availability of ERISA remedies.”
  • “A health care provider may assert an ERISA claim as a ‘beneficiary’ of an employee benefit plan if it has received a valid assignment of benefits.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cromwell v. Equicor-Equitable HCA Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
71 opinions

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.