Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Aunyx Corp. v. Canon U. S. A., Inc.
507 U.S. 973
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1993-03-08
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- noting that librarians at Jackson were not competent to perform legal research and inmates hired as law clerks were not allowed to assist other inmates in legal research
- ‘‘[s]imply including a claim for a jury trial in a complaint [i]s insufficient’’
- upholding district decision giving ITC antitrust decision res judicata effect
- “... essential elements of res judicata, or claim preclusion, are (1) a final judgment on the merits in an earlier action; (2) an identity of parties or privies in the two suits; and (3) an identity of the cause of action in both the earlier and later suits ...”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Aunyx Corp. v. Canon U. S. A., Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 123 opinions
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.