Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Aunyx Corp. v. Canon U. S. A., Inc.

507 U.S. 973

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1993-03-08
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • noting that librarians at Jackson were not competent to perform legal research and inmates hired as law clerks were not allowed to assist other inmates in legal research
  • ‘‘[s]imply including a claim for a jury trial in a complaint [i]s insufficient’’
  • upholding district decision giving ITC antitrust decision res judicata effect
  • “... essential elements of res judicata, or claim preclusion, are (1) a final judgment on the merits in an earlier action; (2) an identity of parties or privies in the two suits; and (3) an identity of the cause of action in both the earlier and later suits ...”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Aunyx Corp. v. Canon U. S. A., Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
123 opinions

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.