Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Pele Defense Fund v. Paty

Pele Def. Fund v. Paty, 507 U.S. 918 (1993)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1993-02-22
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • providing a brief description of the "ceded lands” and listing the five purposes identified in section 5(f) of the Admission Act
  • listing cases and stating that if an expert fails to present sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror could conclude that the expert's position is more likely than not true, a trial court remains free to grant a directed verdict or summary judgment
  • plaintiff had "a full and fair opportunity to litigate the relevant issues” and so was precluded by collateral estoppel from raising the issues again
  • "Issues not properly raised on appeal will be deemed to be waived.” (Citations omitted.)
  • “Article XII, Section 4 [of the Hawai'i State Constitution] imposes a fiduciary duty on Hawai'i’s officials to hold ceded lands in accordance with Section 59(f) trust -provisions, and the citizens of the state must have a means to mandate compliance.”
  • issue on appeal deemed waived

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pele Defense Fund v. Paty. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
91 opinions

Sup. Ct. Haw. Certiorari denied.