Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Amerinet, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.
506 U.S. 1080
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1993-01-19
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding nationwide advertisements, together with other contacts with Texas, insufficient for general jurisdiction where defendant made no effort to limit states in which product marketed
- having a license to conduct business in New Jersey is not "in and of itself sufficient to establish continuous and substantial contacts”
- “In short, a foreign corporation that properly complies with the Texas registration statute only consents to personal jurisdiction where such jurisdiction is constitutionally permissible.”
- “[Daimler] made clear that it is inconsistent with principles of due process for a corporation to be subject to general jurisdiction in every place it does business.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Amerinet, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 117 opinions
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.