Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Amerinet, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.

506 U.S. 1080

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1993-01-19
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding nationwide advertisements, together with other contacts with Texas, insufficient for general jurisdiction where defendant made no effort to limit states in which product marketed
  • having a license to conduct business in New Jersey is not "in and of itself sufficient to establish continuous and substantial contacts”
  • “In short, a foreign corporation that properly complies with the Texas registration statute only consents to personal jurisdiction where such jurisdiction is constitutionally permissible.”
  • “[Daimler] made clear that it is inconsistent with principles of due process for a corporation to be subject to general jurisdiction in every place it does business.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Amerinet, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
117 opinions

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.