Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Maryland Highway Contractors Ass'n v. Maryland

Md. Highway Contractors Ass'n v. Md., 502 U.S. 939 (1991)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1991-11-04
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • finding that hearsay evidence, which is inadmissable at trial, cannot be considered on a motion for summary judgment
  • “[Hearsay evidence, which is inadmissible at trial, cannot be considered on a motion for summary judgment.”
  • claims for declaratory and injunctive relief regarding state minority program dismissed as moot where legislature repealed statute and enacted new statute in attempt to comply with City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469, 109 S.Ct. 706, 102 L.Ed.2d 854 (1989)
  • claims for declaratory and injunctive relief regarding state minority program dismissed as moot where legislature repealed statute and enacted new statute in attempt to comply with City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469, 102 L. Ed. 2d 854 (1989)
  • summary judgment affidavits cannot be based upon hearsay.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Maryland Highway Contractors Ass'n v. Maryland. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
33 opinions

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.