Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Maryland Highway Contractors Ass'n v. Maryland
Md. Highway Contractors Ass'n v. Md., 502 U.S. 939 (1991)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1991-11-04
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- finding that hearsay evidence, which is inadmissable at trial, cannot be considered on a motion for summary judgment
- “[Hearsay evidence, which is inadmissible at trial, cannot be considered on a motion for summary judgment.”
- claims for declaratory and injunctive relief regarding state minority program dismissed as moot where legislature repealed statute and enacted new statute in attempt to comply with City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469, 109 S.Ct. 706, 102 L.Ed.2d 854 (1989)
- claims for declaratory and injunctive relief regarding state minority program dismissed as moot where legislature repealed statute and enacted new statute in attempt to comply with City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469, 102 L. Ed. 2d 854 (1989)
- summary judgment affidavits cannot be based upon hearsay.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Maryland Highway Contractors Ass'n v. Maryland. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 33 opinions
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.