Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Cooper Electric Supply Co. v. Martin

503 U.S. 936

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1992-03-23
Topic
commercial

How later courts describe this case

  • convening authority was not subject, to unlawful command influence through SECNAV policy guidance stating that national security cases should ordinarily be referred to trial by general court-martial
  • “defendant employer bears the ‘plain and substantial’ burden of proving he is entitled to discretionary relief from the FLSA’s mandatory liquidated damages provision.”
  • NPS’s failure to install ground wires on high-voltage power lines involved technical, economic and social considerations and was, therefore, protected by exception.
  • discontinuance of retired pay not subject to judicial review by military appellate courts

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cooper Electric Supply Co. v. Martin. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
75 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.