Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Quinones v. United States
498 U.S. 1069
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1991-01-22
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- recognizing, but not deciding, that the test which apparently emerges from Broce seems to turn on whether the claim of double jeopardy may be adjudicated on the face of the record, or requires supplemental evidence
- applying principle of Broce in a direct constitutional challenge to a guilty plea
- declining to find that Corbin overruled the "sword exception" to double jeopardy
- first two counts seemingly based on one sale and one attempted sale occurring on two different dates one month apart; third count seemingly based on seizure
- other bank employees could have executed same embezzlement scheme as defendant, but defendant’s position of trust which gave her authority to routinely balance her own loan transactions facilitated her embezzle-ments
- embezzlement conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 656
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Quinones v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 35 opinions
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.