Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Munters Corp. v. Matsui America, Inc.
498 U.S. 1016
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1990-12-10
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- observing that “Congress’ purpose in enacting § 1346 was to restore the mail fraud statute to its pre- McNally position”
- "Park 'N Fly does not preclude consideration of a mark’s strength for purposes of determining the likelihood of confusion.”
- “A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based on a trial attorney’s failure to make a motion or objection must demonstrate not only the absence of a tactical reason for the omission ... but also that the motion or objection would have been meritoriousf.]”
- "A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based on a trial attorney's failure to make a motion or objection must demonstrate not only the absence of a tactical reason for the omission ... but also that the motion or objection would have been meritorious[.]"
- denying petition for writ of certiorari
- property interest in medical license
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Munters Corp. v. Matsui America, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 67 opinions
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice White would grant certiorari.