Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc.
498 U.S. 992
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1990-11-26
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- readministering Miranda warnings was insufficient to clarify when detective made negative comments designed to persuade suspect to keep talking
- drawing distinction between procedural challenges to agency action, which must be brought within statutory review period or be forever barred, and substantive challenges, which are not subject to such a restriction
- “the scope of fraud under these [federal fraud] statutes is broader than common law fraud, and ... no misrepresentation of fact is required”
- alleged kickbacks in violation of federal law were not deceptive because they did not induce plaintiff to give, up its exclusive dealership
- breach of contract does not constitute a scheme to defraud
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 66 opinions
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Souter took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.