Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc.

498 U.S. 992

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-11-26
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • readministering Miranda warnings was insufficient to clarify when detective made negative comments designed to persuade suspect to keep talking
  • drawing distinction between procedural challenges to agency action, which must be brought within statutory review period or be forever barred, and substantive challenges, which are not subject to such a restriction
  • “the scope of fraud under these [federal fraud] statutes is broader than common law fraud, and ... no misrepresentation of fact is required”
  • alleged kickbacks in violation of federal law were not deceptive because they did not induce plaintiff to give, up its exclusive dealership
  • breach of contract does not constitute a scheme to defraud

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
66 opinions

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Souter took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.