Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Pokorny v. Ford Motor Co.

498 U.S. 853

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-10-01
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding no error where a witness merely described her personal observations concerning the emotions of the victim during their counseling sessions
  • distinguishing casual encounter between police officer and college student from “the kind of association to which a specially protected constitutional right” might attach
  • “[I]t is well-established that a savings clause ... does not ‘save’ common law actions that would subvert a federal statutory or regulatory scheme.”
  • "Indeed, a taxpayer who owes back taxes for several years may pay interest on and sue with respect to only one of them.”
  • the question of express preemption is properly analyzed only after consideration of both Sections 1392(d) and 1397(k)
  • associations for purposes other than expression are more properly viewed as stemming from the Fourteenth Amendment right to substantive due process rather than from the First Amendment
  • a common law rule cannot prohibit the exercise of a federally granted option
  • the right of intimate association is not protected by the first amendment

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pokorny v. Ford Motor Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
114 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.