Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Pokorny v. Ford Motor Co.
498 U.S. 853
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1990-10-01
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding no error where a witness merely described her personal observations concerning the emotions of the victim during their counseling sessions
- distinguishing casual encounter between police officer and college student from “the kind of association to which a specially protected constitutional right” might attach
- “[I]t is well-established that a savings clause ... does not ‘save’ common law actions that would subvert a federal statutory or regulatory scheme.”
- "Indeed, a taxpayer who owes back taxes for several years may pay interest on and sue with respect to only one of them.”
- the question of express preemption is properly analyzed only after consideration of both Sections 1392(d) and 1397(k)
- associations for purposes other than expression are more properly viewed as stemming from the Fourteenth Amendment right to substantive due process rather than from the First Amendment
- a common law rule cannot prohibit the exercise of a federally granted option
- the right of intimate association is not protected by the first amendment
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pokorny v. Ford Motor Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 114 opinions
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.