Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Tocco v. New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing

Tocco v. N.J. Council on Affordable Hous., 499 U.S. 937 (1991)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1991-03-25
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding dismissal of plaintiffs claim is appropriate where complaint contains only eonclusory allegations of a violation of a Constitutional right
  • allowing recovery of attorneys' fees and litigation costs by private party CERCLA plaintiff
  • complaints based on violation of constitutional right must contain more than conclusory allegation to avoid dismissal
  • plaintiff, a former owner of the site, entered into consent decree with state agency and others to cleanup a site prior to plaintiffs section 107(a) claim against another PRP
  • plaintiff, a former owner of a site, entered into a consent decree with a state agency and others to clean up a site prior to plaintiff's § 107(a) action against another PRP
  • input of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR
  • NCP specifically contemplates excavations as appropriate removal actions
  • listing eases on both sides of controversy

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Tocco v. New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
115 opinions

Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied.