Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Moore v. Regents of the University of California
499 U.S. 936
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1991-03-25
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- recognizing a lighter burden for employers of firefighters
- "Because the money paid by the settling defendants and recovery from Mmahat overlap, we feel Mmahat should get credit for the amount paid"
- actions by debtor savings and loan’s general counsel urging corporation to make improper loans so he could earn fees was defalcation while in a fiduciary relationship.
- breaches of fiduciary duty of attorney/board member for failed financial institution, in advising board to make improvident loans from which his law firm made substantial fees in transactions, gave rise to debt nondischargeable under § 523(a)(4)
- suit against general counsel of failed savings & loan
- refusing to apply property law to cells and bodily tissues
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Moore v. Regents of the University of California. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 58 opinions
Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.