Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Moore v. Regents of the University of California

499 U.S. 936

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1991-03-25
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • recognizing a lighter burden for employers of firefighters
  • "Because the money paid by the settling defendants and recovery from Mmahat overlap, we feel Mmahat should get credit for the amount paid"
  • actions by debtor savings and loan’s general counsel urging corporation to make improper loans so he could earn fees was defalcation while in a fiduciary relationship.
  • breaches of fiduciary duty of attorney/board member for failed financial institution, in advising board to make improvident loans from which his law firm made substantial fees in transactions, gave rise to debt nondischargeable under § 523(a)(4)
  • suit against general counsel of failed savings & loan
  • refusing to apply property law to cells and bodily tissues

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Moore v. Regents of the University of California. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
58 opinions

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.