Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Vastola v. United States

497 U.S. 1001

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-06-25
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • “The key question under Rule 4(b) is when the notice of appeal was filed, not when the time extension was granted.”
  • remanded for reconsideration in light of United States v. Rios, 495 U.S. 257, 110 S.Ct. 1845, 109 L.Ed.2d 224 (1990)
  • “A missing witness instruction is not appropriate when the witness is available to both the defense and the prosecution.”
  • "Several courts of appeals have construed this provision to mean that, in criminal cases, a notice of appeal filed within thirty days after the expiration of the filing period functions as a request for an extension of time ____”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Vastola v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
31 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Ojeda Rios, 495 U. S. 257 (1990).