Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Vastola v. United States
497 U.S. 1001
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1990-06-25
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- “The key question under Rule 4(b) is when the notice of appeal was filed, not when the time extension was granted.”
- remanded for reconsideration in light of United States v. Rios, 495 U.S. 257, 110 S.Ct. 1845, 109 L.Ed.2d 224 (1990)
- “A missing witness instruction is not appropriate when the witness is available to both the defense and the prosecution.”
- "Several courts of appeals have construed this provision to mean that, in criminal cases, a notice of appeal filed within thirty days after the expiration of the filing period functions as a request for an extension of time ____”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Vastola v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 31 opinions
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Ojeda Rios, 495 U. S. 257 (1990).