Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Gozlon-Peretz v. United States
496 U.S. 935
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1990-06-18
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- invalidating state's new reimbursement plan which resulted in cutting provider reimbursement by 46% across the board
- “The state agency’s determination of procedural and substantive compliance with federal law is not entitled to the deference afforded a federal agency!”
- “change in payment rates under the state plan requires the state Medicaid agency to submit the plan amendment to HCFA for approval.”
- defendant — independent security firm whose “drug-sniffing” dog acted in manner causing police officer to apply for and receive search warrant — neither “state actor”, nor hable, in § 1983 lawsuit
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gozlon-Peretz v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 86 opinions
C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Whether the mandatory minimum terms of supervised release required by the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 became effective for offenses committed on or after the date of enactment, October 27, 1986.”