Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Cannedy v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
493 U.S. 891
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1989-10-10
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- magistrate's order requiring corporation to produce corporate officers in Chicago was correct because location was corporation's principal place of business
- motion to reconsider is frivolous if it contains no new evidence or arguments or law that explains why court should change an original order
- “An attorney takes a frivolous position if he fails to make a reasonable inquiry into facts (which later prove false) ...”
- direet effect is one that is substantial and foreseeable, mere financial loss is insufficient
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cannedy v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 40 opinions
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.