Terwilliger v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

How later courts describe this case

• relying on Miller v. Chrysler Corp., 748 F.2d 323, 326 (6th Cir.1984)
• all concerning obligations assumed by the respective unions to inspect work environments for unsafe conditions
• “When a collective bargaining agreement imposes a duty of fair representation there is federal jurisdiction over a claim for breach of that duty under section 301.”
• “Since the labor arbitrator is designed to function in essence as the parties’ surrogate, he cannot ‘misinterpret’ a collective bargaining agreement”
• Section 301 preempts claims whose resolution requires interpretation of the terms of a collective bargaining agreement or claims based on rights created by the collective bargaining agreement.
• regional airline, which had an exclusive regional service agreement with a commercial airline, did not suffer antitrust injury when terminated because commercial airline acquired another airline and no longer needed regional airline’s services