Hawk-Bey v. United States

How later courts describe this case

• holding that a co-conspirator’s plea hearing transcript is inadmissible under Rule 804(b)(1) because the government does not have a motive to develop the co-conspirator’s testimony on cross-examination at the plea hearing
• applying this rule of construction to 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), which requires either intent to commit a felony involving a bank or intent to commit any larceny
• “When a defendant fails to renew a motion for severance at the close of the evidence the issue is waived.”