Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Scott v. Dreamlite Holdings Ltd.

Scott v. Dreamlite Holdings Ltd., 110 S. Ct. 1924 (1990)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-04-23
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that there can be no extracontraetual recovery in the context of an ERISA plan
  • “[W]hen it is possible to offer a reasoned explanation, based on evidence for a particular outcome, the outcome is not arbitrary and capricious.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Scott v. Dreamlite Holdings Ltd.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
109 opinions

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Denied.