Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Nivica v. United States
494 U.S. 1005
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1990-02-26
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that district court has broad discretion in admitting expert testimony and that district court's decision qualifying a witness as an expert will not be reversed unless manifestly in error
- defendant who does not testify may not challenge ruling regarding the scope of permissible cross-examination
- risks of juror questioning of witnesses are "compounded in a criminal case"
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Nivica v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 82 opinions
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.