Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 639 v. Yellow Bus Lines, Inc.

How later courts describe this case

• recognizing the range of views on whether psychologists are competent to give an opinion on future dangerousness
• noting that criminal defendants generally have the right to plead guilty to charged offenses
• refusing to construe Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution as a due process clause
• discussing criminal defendant's traditional right in Oregon to waive right to jury trial by pleading guilty
• interpreting “probability” in second question to mean “more likely than not”
• discussing harmlessness of cumulative evidence in context of an illegal search
• judgment in 305 Or. 115, 752 P.2d 1136 vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Penry
• the ballot title prepared by this court makes “crystal clear” the proper interpretation of a constitutional provision