Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Trinsey v. State Ethics Commission

488 U.S. 927

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1988-10-31
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • "we have recognized that expert testimony of law enforcement officials concerning the particular methods and practices of those engaged in organized criminal activity carries the risk of prejudicing criminal defendants"
  • " 'the standards applicable in delay-of-sealing cases ... are relevant to the unsealing problem’ ”
  • trial court may rely on juror’s statement of continued impartiality

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Trinsey v. State Ethics Commission. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
72 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.