Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Vallier v. United States District Court

488 U.S. 880

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1988-10-03
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • noting that in Keogh, the Supreme Court stated that the main purpose of the Interstate Commerce Act was the prevention of unjust discrimination, and that this required that ICC-approved rates be the sole source of a shipper’s rights against a carrier
  • applying filed tariff doctrine to insulate defendant from antitrust liability and rejecting competitor exception
  • “[Participation in the FRP is a privilege, not a right .... ” (internal citations omitted)
  • when resolution of issue not presented below will "materially advance the progress of [the] already protracted litigation, [courts of appeal] should address it" if the issue has been "presented with sufficient clarity and completeness"
  • inmate with AIDS denied conjugal visit with his wife

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Vallier v. United States District Court. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
220 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari and/or mandamus denied.