Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Florida Power & Light Co. v. United States

490 U.S. 1045

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1989-05-01
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • administrative rules and regulations must be writ ten, must describe with particularity what is forbidden, and must create standards that eliminate vagueness and uncertainty
  • user fee upheld once adequate time was provided for comments and sufficient factual detail made public to permit interested parties to comment meaningfully
  • retroactivity of Arizona v. Roberson, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct.2093, 100 L.Ed.2d 704 (1988) (police questioning barred after invocation of right to counsel in context of separate investigation)
  • retroactivity of Arizona v. Roberson, 486 U.S. 675, 108 S.Ct. 2093, 100 L.Ed.2d 704 (1988) (police questioning barred after invocation of right to counsel in context of separate investigation)

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Florida Power & Light Co. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
40 opinions

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.