Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Amoco Production Co. v. Hodel

487 U.S. 1234

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1988-06-30
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • noting that to defeat summary judgment, expert affidavits cannot involve "mere speculation or idiosyncratic opinion"
  • substantial segment of scientific community relies on animal studies in assessing health risks in humans
  • Testimony by experts as to causation lacked a sufficient foundation where the experts failed to take into account plaintiffs’ specific medical histories and habits; court also based its decision on the fact that the experts failed to rule out other possible causes.
  • expert opinions cannot involve "mere speculation or idiosyncratic opinion”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Amoco Production Co. v. Hodel. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
112 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.