Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

City of New York v. Eastway Construction Corp.

484 U.S. 918

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1987-10-19
Topic
real-estate

How later courts describe this case

  • showing of subjective bad faith not required to trigger Rule 11 sanctions
  • death penalty statute neither vague, overbroad, imposed in a discriminatory manner, nor involves subjective discretion
  • wherein the Court, addressing a claim made pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986
  • sanctions can be imposed for filings made for an “improper purpose” even where the attorney conducted a reasonable investigation
  • Rule 11 is violated when it is "patently clear that a claim has absolutely no chance of success under the existing precedents"
  • all ambiguities and inferences should be resolved in favor of the party defending a summary judgment motion
  • “Even a single act of invidious discrimination may form the basis for an equal protection violation.”
  • "The defendant cannot successfully argue that error is plain in the record when there is no indication in the record that the act upon which error is predicated ever occurred."

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed City of New York v. Eastway Construction Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
540 opinions

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.