Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Sodowski v. National Flood Insurance Program of the Federal Emergency Management Agency

486 U.S. 1043

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1988-06-06
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • rejecting Quesada's expansion of the SFIP's coverage as "an act of judicial activism”
  • plaintiff not entitled to recover for structural damage caused by soil settlement regardless of the cause of the soil settlement
  • the standard flood insurance policy does not provide coverage for losses caused by earth movement even if such movement is caused by flooding
  • “Courts are not at liberty to embark upon a broad, undifferentiated mission of vindicating constitutional rights; after all, Article III specifically limits the judicial power of the United States to the resolution of actual cases or controversies.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sodowski v. National Flood Insurance Program of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
44 opinions

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.