Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
West 14th Street Commercial Corp. v. 5 West 14th Owners Corp.
W. 14th St. Commercial Corp. v. 5 W. 14th Owners Corp., 484 U.S. 871 (1987)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1987-10-05
- Topic
- real-estate
How later courts describe this case
- holding that FERC’s interpretation of a settlement agreement between the Commission’s staff and a private party was entitled to Chevron deference
- discussing why a lease is a "contract" within meaning of the Act
- even if Staff is considered a “party” to settlement negotiations, the Commission itself does not thereby become improperly involved in negotiations
- use of the term “set up” in a familial context implied that one family member provided an opportunity to another family member on the basis of kinship, not merit
- "if the agency itself were an interested party ... deference might lead a court to endorse self-serving views that an agency might offer...."
- “[A] plaintiff may prove the defendant’s subjective state of mind through the cumulation of circumstantial evidence.”
- “if the agency itself were an interested party ... deference might lead a court to endorse self-serving views that an agency might of-fer_”
- court should defer to agency’s construction of agreement
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed West 14th Street Commercial Corp. v. 5 West 14th Owners Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 113 opinions
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of Council for Owner-Occupied Housing, Inc., for leave to file a brief as