Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Biasucci v. United States

479 U.S. 827

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1986-10-06
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that defendant's knowledge of the specific interest rates charged on usurious loans is not needed for a collection of unlawful debts violation under RICO
  • finding that prosecutor’s insulting remarks about defense counsel were improper, but did not require reversal
  • holding no ground for new trial based on denial of due process where judge struck prosecution’s inappropriate comment from record and immediately gave curative instruction
  • where prosecutor called defense counsel “sleaze” and “you hypocritical son of a bitch”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Biasucci v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
83 opinions

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.