Nyflot v. Minnesota Commissioner of Public Safety

How later courts describe this case

• dismissing for lack of a substantial federal question Appellant’s claim that her Constitutional rights were violated when she was refused counsel prior to submitting to a sobriety test
• diminished intellectual capacity of defendant only a factor to be considered in determining whether Miranda waiver knowing and intelligent
• appeal, in which the defendant claimed a sixth amendment right to counsel with respect to the decision whether to consent to a blood alcohol test, was dismissed for want of substantial federal question
• summary dismissal for want of substantial federal question