Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Carroll v. Alberts

474 U.S. 1013

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1985-12-02
Topic
finance

How later courts describe this case

  • First Amendment free exercise clause does not bar imposition of tort liability for religiously motivated activity which amounts to a breach of physician-patient confidentiality
  • “society is entitled to every person’s evidence in order that the truth may be discovered”
  • “the First Amendment prohibits civil courts from intervening in disputes concerning religious doctrine, discipline, faith, or internal organization”
  • “First Amendment prohibits civil courts from intervening in disputes concerning religious doctrine, discipline, faith, or internal organization”
  • “It is clear that the assessment of an individual’s qualifications to be a minister, and the appointment and retirement of ministers, are ecclesiastical matters entitled to constitutional protection against judicial or other State interference”
  • “all physicians owe their patients a duty, for violation of which the law provides a remedy, not to disclose without the patient’s consent medical information about the patient, except to meet a serious danger to the patient or others”
  • "The courts that have imposed on physicians a duty of confidentiality and have recognized a cause of action to enforce that duty have grounded their decisions on the determination that public policy favors the protection of a patient's right to confidentiality"
  • declaring physician's duty not to disclose patient's medical information

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Carroll v. Alberts. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
34 opinions

Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Motion of General Council on Finance and Administration of the United Methodist Church et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.

Justice Brennan *1014 and Justice White would grant certiorari.