Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Bellissimo v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

475 U.S. 1035

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1986-02-24
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • finding no authority for the contention that “putative class members may piggyback one class action onto another and thus toll the statute of limitations indefinitely”
  • applying Texas’ two-year limitation on actions to enforce debts not evidenced by a contract in writing
  • sex discrimination claim maintained by in-house counsel against her employer, although attorney-client defense not asserted
  • summary judgment granted in favor of employer where female employee failed to show that any similarly situated male employees were treated differently
  • dress codes permissible although specific requirements for males and females may differ
  • farmer association held joint employer where association had a contract of employment, specified the duration of employment, offered visa petitions, outlined employment conditions, including a work guarantee, an hourly rate guarantee and a transportation allowance

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bellissimo v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
98 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice O’Connor would grant certiorari.