Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Bellissimo v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

Bellissimo v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 475 U.S. 1035 (1986)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1986-02-24
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • finding no authority for the contention that “putative class members may piggyback one class action onto another and thus toll the statute of limitations indefinitely”
  • applying Texas’ two-year limitation on actions to enforce debts not evidenced by a contract in writing
  • sex discrimination claim maintained by in-house counsel against her employer, although attorney-client defense not asserted
  • summary judgment granted in favor of employer where female employee failed to show that any similarly situated male employees were treated differently
  • dress codes permissible although specific requirements for males and females may differ
  • farmer association held joint employer where association had a contract of employment, specified the duration of employment, offered visa petitions, outlined employment conditions, including a work guarantee, an hourly rate guarantee and a transportation allowance

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bellissimo v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
98 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice O’Connor would grant certiorari.