Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Humphrey v. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n

472 U.S. 1004

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1985-06-10
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • dismissing for want of substantial federal question appeal from decision of Supreme Court of Hawaii, Puchert v. Agsalud, 67 Haw. 25, 677 P. 2d 449 (1984) that discharge in retaliation for workers' compensation claim not preempted by the Railway Labor Act
  • Justice White dissenting from dismissal of appeal for want of a substantial federal question

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Humphrey v. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
24 opinions

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Iowa. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, 471 U. S. 626 (1985). Justice Rehnquist and Justice O’Connor would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.