Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Gold Cross Ambulance Co. v. Kansas City

471 U.S. 1003

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1985-04-01
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • zoning ordinance which limited commercial development on certain land and thereby diminished land’s value did not effect a taking
  • continuing failure to register with Selective Service was a separate offense
  • “Unilateral expectation of being awarded a license is insufficient to sustain [a] procedural due process claim.”
  • “regulation by the City itself satisfies the active supervision requirement ... since its regulation of ambulance service is exercised under the authorization and direction of state policy.”
  • state action immunity shielded city from liability from awarding contract for redevelopment to private developer and from zoning ordinances restricting commercial development of outlying areas
  • interstate sale of revenue bonds, among other things, meets “effect-on-commerce” jurisdictional requirement
  • ambulance service operated by city hospital

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gold Cross Ambulance Co. v. Kansas City. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
93 opinions

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.