Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Gold Cross Ambulance Co. v. Kansas City

Gold Cross Ambulance Co. v. Kan. City, 471 U.S. 1003 (1985)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1985-04-01
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • zoning ordinance which limited commercial development on certain land and thereby diminished land’s value did not effect a taking
  • continuing failure to register with Selective Service was a separate offense
  • “Unilateral expectation of being awarded a license is insufficient to sustain [a] procedural due process claim.”
  • “regulation by the City itself satisfies the active supervision requirement ... since its regulation of ambulance service is exercised under the authorization and direction of state policy.”
  • state action immunity shielded city from liability from awarding contract for redevelopment to private developer and from zoning ordinances restricting commercial development of outlying areas
  • interstate sale of revenue bonds, among other things, meets “effect-on-commerce” jurisdictional requirement
  • ambulance service operated by city hospital

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gold Cross Ambulance Co. v. Kansas City. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
93 opinions

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.