Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Gold Cross Ambulance Co. v. Kansas City
471 U.S. 1003
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1985-04-01
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- zoning ordinance which limited commercial development on certain land and thereby diminished land’s value did not effect a taking
- continuing failure to register with Selective Service was a separate offense
- “Unilateral expectation of being awarded a license is insufficient to sustain [a] procedural due process claim.”
- “regulation by the City itself satisfies the active supervision requirement ... since its regulation of ambulance service is exercised under the authorization and direction of state policy.”
- state action immunity shielded city from liability from awarding contract for redevelopment to private developer and from zoning ordinances restricting commercial development of outlying areas
- interstate sale of revenue bonds, among other things, meets “effect-on-commerce” jurisdictional requirement
- ambulance service operated by city hospital
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gold Cross Ambulance Co. v. Kansas City. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 93 opinions
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.