Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
McKaskle Director, Texas Department of Corrections v. Conrado Vela
464 U.S. 1053
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1984-01-09
- Topic
- labor-and-employment
How later courts describe this case
- Justice O'Connor, joined by Chief Justice Burger and Justice Rehnquist, dissenting from denial of certiorari
- defense attorney’s failure to make proper objections to testimony and the prosecutors’ argument revealed ignorance of the law and constitutes deficient performance
- defense attorney’s failure to make the proper objections to testimony and the prosecutors’ argument revealed ignorance of the law and constitutes deficient performance
- pre-Strickland decision in which we held that defense counsel who failed to specifically object, ask for a curative instruction, or preserve for appeal error as to prejudicial testimony, did not render reasonably effective assistance of counsel
- district court's denial of habeas corpus relief reversed
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed McKaskle Director, Texas Department of Corrections v. Conrado Vela. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 43 opinions
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pawperis granted. Cer-tiorari denied.