Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

McKaskle Director, Texas Department of Corrections v. Conrado Vela

464 U.S. 1053

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1984-01-09
Topic
labor-and-employment

How later courts describe this case

  • Justice O'Connor, joined by Chief Justice Burger and Justice Rehnquist, dissenting from denial of certiorari
  • defense attorney’s failure to make proper objections to testimony and the prosecutors’ argument revealed ignorance of the law and constitutes deficient performance
  • defense attorney’s failure to make the proper objections to testimony and the prosecutors’ argument revealed ignorance of the law and constitutes deficient performance
  • pre-Strickland decision in which we held that defense counsel who failed to specifically object, ask for a curative instruction, or preserve for appeal error as to prejudicial testimony, did not render reasonably effective assistance of counsel
  • district court's denial of habeas corpus relief reversed

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed McKaskle Director, Texas Department of Corrections v. Conrado Vela. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
43 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pawperis granted. Cer-tiorari denied.