Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Marroquin-Manriguez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Marroquin-Manriguez v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 467 U.S. 1259 (1984)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1984-06-25
- Topic
- labor-and-employment
How later courts describe this case
- holding that the scope or conduct of discovery is within the sound discretion of the district court
- allowing equitable tolling where an employer had brought a non-frivolous constitutional challenge to the MPPAA on an issue not previously decided
- "The Court's method of analysis in Turner Elkhorn Mining represents a fundamental shift from that employed in Alton Railroad."
- a district court has broad discretion in determining the manner in which discovery is conducted.
- the scope and conduct of discovery are within the sound discretion of the trial court
- availability of information under FOIA would undercut the showing of need necessary under 8 C.F.R. § 287.4(a)(2)
- “MPPAA ... protects the interlocking interests of the PBGC, the premium payers, the withdrawing employers and the vested employees.”
- law prohibiting local liquor advertising directly advances government’s interest in discouraging liquor consumption despite fact that residents are exposed to liquor advertising from out-of-state sources
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Marroquin-Manriguez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 168 opinions
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.