Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Marroquin-Manriguez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Marroquin-Manriguez v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 467 U.S. 1259 (1984)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1984-06-25
Topic
labor-and-employment

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that the scope or conduct of discovery is within the sound discretion of the district court
  • allowing equitable tolling where an employer had brought a non-frivolous constitutional challenge to the MPPAA on an issue not previously decided
  • "The Court's method of analysis in Turner Elkhorn Mining represents a fundamental shift from that employed in Alton Railroad."
  • a district court has broad discretion in determining the manner in which discovery is conducted.
  • the scope and conduct of discovery are within the sound discretion of the trial court
  • availability of information under FOIA would undercut the showing of need necessary under 8 C.F.R. § 287.4(a)(2)
  • “MPPAA ... protects the interlocking interests of the PBGC, the premium payers, the withdrawing employers and the vested employees.”
  • law prohibiting local liquor advertising directly advances government’s interest in discouraging liquor consumption despite fact that residents are exposed to liquor advertising from out-of-state sources

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Marroquin-Manriguez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
168 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.