Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
McKenzie v. General Motors Corp.
464 U.S. 938
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1983-10-31
- Topic
- commercial
How later courts describe this case
- court has discretion to deny leave to amend where the proposed amendment would not withstand a motion to dismiss
- leave to amend need not be granted where the amendment would not withstand a motion to dismiss
- trial court may deny leave to amend where amendment would not withstand a motion to dismiss
- "An adverse effect on a single employee, or even a few employees, is not sufficient to establish disparate impact.”
- “the trial court may properly deny leave to amend where the amendment would not withstand a motion to dismiss”
- The plaintiffs’ burden with respect to a disparate impact claim is heavier than it is when disparate treatment is alleged
- disparate impact analysis requires showing that facially neutral employment practice had a significantly discriminatory impact
- “the nature of the required showing depends on the circumstances of the case”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed McKenzie v. General Motors Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 215 opinions
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.