Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

McKenzie v. General Motors Corp.

464 U.S. 938

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1983-10-31
Topic
commercial

How later courts describe this case

  • court has discretion to deny leave to amend where the proposed amendment would not withstand a motion to dismiss
  • leave to amend need not be granted where the amendment would not withstand a motion to dismiss
  • trial court may deny leave to amend where amendment would not withstand a motion to dismiss
  • "An adverse effect on a single employee, or even a few employees, is not sufficient to establish disparate impact.”
  • “the trial court may properly deny leave to amend where the amendment would not withstand a motion to dismiss”
  • The plaintiffs’ burden with respect to a disparate impact claim is heavier than it is when disparate treatment is alleged
  • disparate impact analysis requires showing that facially neutral employment practice had a significantly discriminatory impact
  • “the nature of the required showing depends on the circumstances of the case”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed McKenzie v. General Motors Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
215 opinions

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.