Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Griffin v. Texas

465 U.S. 1051

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1984-02-21
Topic: general

How later courts describe this case

where Miranda warnings given, handcuffs and ten hours of detention, including five hours of intensive questioning, does not demonstrate that confession was coerced
evidence of unadjudicated criminal activity admitted in sentencing phase of capital-murder proceedings

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Griffin v. Texas. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 43 opinions

Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;

Sup. Ct. Idaho;

Sup. Ct. La.;

Sup. Ct. Ark.;

C. A. 11th Cir.;

Sup. Ct. Fla.;

Sup. Ct. Fla.;

Sup. Ct. Fla.;

Sup. Ct. Ala.;

Super. Ct. Ariz., Maricopa County;

Sup. Ct. La.;

Sup. Ct. Fla.;

Sup. Ct. Fla.;

C. A. 5th Cir.;

Sup. Ct. Wyo.; and

Sup. Ct. Ark. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 83-5792, 665 S. W. 2d 762; No. 83-5818, 105 Idaho 362, 670 P. 2d 463; No. 83-5836, 436 So. 2d 553; No. 83-5849, 280 Ark. 77, 656 S. W. 2d 684; No. 83-5897, 715 F. 2d 1452; No. 83-5905, 437 So. 2d 1072; No. 83-5909, 437 So. 2d 1082; No. 83-5924, 438 So. 2d 774; No. 83-5939, 437 So. 2d 1356; No. 83-5955, 436 So. 2d 1141; No. 83-5973, 438 So. 2d 380; No. 83-5977, 438 So. 2d 374; No. 83-5980, 720 F. 2d 401; No. 83-5999, 672 P. 2d 777; No. 83-6009, 280 Ark. 509, 660 S. W. 2d 648.