Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Miskovsky v. World Publishing Co.

465 U.S. 1007

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1984-01-23
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • assurances by persons without authority to bind an employer do not create a property interest
  • defamatory statement must occur "at or near the time of employee's termination since that is when the liberty interest arises, if at all."
  • judge immune for inducing a citizen to swear out a warrant to arrest the plaintiff
  • statements as to the plaintiff’s "failure to meet the level of management skill required to properly and efficiently administer the Department of Public Works” does not stigmatize
  • “Rule 56 demands something more specific than the bald assertion of the general truth of a particular matter, [sic] rather it requires affidavits that cite specific concrete facts establishing the existence of the truth of the matter asserted.”
  • dismissal of county superintendent for mismanagement does not impinge liberty interest
  • charge of mismanagement by superintendent of public works not stigmatizing
  • charges of mismanagement not stigmatizing

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Miskovsky v. World Publishing Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
71 opinions

Sup. Ct. Okla. Certiorari denied.