Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Gillette Co. v. Miner

459 U.S. 86

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1982-12-06
Topic
litigation

Per Curiam. There being no final judgment, the writ of certiorari is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gillette Co. v. Miner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
20 opinions
GILLETTE CO.v. MINER,459 U.S. 86(1982)
GILLETTE CO.v. MINER
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS
No. 81-1493.
Argued November 10, 1982
Decided December 6, 1982
Certiorari dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Reported below:87 Ill.2d 7,428 N.E.2d 478.
Arthur R. Millerargued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs wereH. Blair White, Russell M. Baird, George A. Platz, andJamesP. Connolly.Robert S. Atkinsargued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief wereKenneth P. Ross, Paul Bernstein, andHarry G. Fins.fn*
PER CURIAM.
There being no final judgment, the writ of certiorari is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.Page 87
  1. Page 86 Briefs ofamici curiaeurging reversal were filed byHaroldD. ShapiroandDuane C. Quainifor the National Association of Independent Insurers et al.; byJoseph D. AlvianiandWayne S. Hendersonfor the New England Legal Foundation; and byThomas J. BrandiandC.Delos Putz, Jr., for the plaintiffs in the "Dalkon Shield" IUD Products Liability Litigation et al.

    Briefs ofamici curiaeurging affirmance were filed byPaul P. Biebel,Jr., First Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, andKathleen NoganMorrisonandWilliam P. Oberhardt, Assistant Attorneys General, for Tyrone C. Fahner, Attorney General of Illinois, et al.; and byAlan B. MorrisonandFrederic Townsendfor Public Citizen.David B. Kahn, William J. Harte, andKevin M. Fordefiled a brief for the Consumer Coalition asamicus curiae. ↩