Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Pinckard v. Pinckard
461 U.S. 913
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1983-05-02
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- overwhelming evidence that victim would lose its position as town and county insurance broker if payments not met
- "The prohibition against schemes or artifices to defraud is properly interpreted to be independent of the clause 'for obtaining money or property.' "
- “the concepts of reliance, and de facto control and dominance ... are at the heart of fiduciary duty”
- ballot initiative banning storage of radioactive waste generated out of state and transportation of such waste to disposal sites within the state
- conduct charged in mail fraud indictment was within power of government to proscribe and application of statute in this case would not deter protected political activities in other contexts
- mail fraud indictment for political corruption will not chill legitimate political associational activities protected by first amendment
- “The broad language of the statute ... is not unconstitutionally vague because [the statute] contains the requirement that the defendant must have acted willfully and with a specific intent to defraud.”
- rights of citizens to have government conducted honestly and free from corruption and fraud
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pinckard v. Pinckard. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 288 opinions
Ct. App. Tex., 14th Sup. Jud. Dist. Certiorari denied.