Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United States

How later courts describe this case

• district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to award prejudgment interest to successful Title VII claimant
• “Generally, ineffective assistance of counsel is a collateral matter which should be addressed through a motion for post-conviction relief.”
• ineffective assistance of counsel is collateral matter that may not be raised for the first time on appeal, unless facts on which claim is based are evident in appellate record
• judicial proceedings of the Illinois FEPC satisfy due process requirements
• Illinois statute provided deferential review equivalent to that endorsed in Kremer