Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Ex parte Patrick

212 U.S. 555

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1908-11-16
Topic
general

Per Curiam: Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Act , of March 10,1908, c. 76, 35 Stat. 40; Bilik v. Strassheim, sheriff of Cook County, Illinois, decided October 19,1908, ante, p. 551. Application for writ of habeas corpus denied.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ex parte Patrick. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
21 opinions
EX PARTE PATRICK,212 U.S. 555(1908)
29 S.Ct. 686
Ex partePATRICK.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK.
Submitted November 9, 1908.
Decided November 16, 1908.
Appeal from decision of the Circuit Court denying a petition forhabeas corpuswhen petitioner was detained under power of a state court dismissed for want of jurisdiction. There was no certificate of probable cause for allowing the appeal in conformity with the act of March 10, 1908, c. 76,35 Stat. 40.1
Mr. Albert T. Patrickinpropria personaandMr. WilliamL. McDonaldfor the appellant.Mr. Robert C. Taylorfor the State of New York appeared by leave of the court.
Per Curiam:
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Act of March 10, 1908, c. 76,35 Stat. 40;Bilikv.Strassheim, sheriff of Cook County, Illinois, decided October 19, 1908,ante, p. 551. Application for writ ofhabeas corpusdenied.
  1. Page 555 For this act in full seeante, p. 551. ↩