Opinion · Txlaw Texas

BELL v. STATE, 103 Tex. Crim. 111 (1926)

279 S.W. 1116

Type
Opinion
Court
Txlaw Texas
Jurisdiction
Txlaw
Date
1926-02-03
Topic
general

BELL v. STATE, 103 Tex. Crim. 111 (1926) 279 S.W. 1116 ELMO BELL v. THE STATE. No. 10050.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BELL v. STATE, 103 Tex. Crim. 111 (1926). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BELL v. STATE,103 Tex. Crim. 111(1926)
279 S.W. 1116
ELMO BELL v. THE STATE.
No. 10050.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Delivered February 3, 1926.
Sale of Intoxicating Liquor — No Statement of Facts — NoBills of Exception.

This record is before us without either a statement of facts, or bills of exception, and no fundamental error being perceived the judgment is affirmed.
Appeal from the District Court of Upshur County. Tried below before the Hon. J. R. Warren, Judge.

Appeal from a conviction for the sale of intoxicating liquor, penalty one year in the penitentiary.
No brief filed for appellant.
Sam D. Stinson,State's Attorney, andNat Gentry, Jr.,Assistant State's Attorney, for the State.
MORROW, PRESIDING JUDGE. —
The offense is the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before us without statement of facts of bills of exception. No fundamental error has been perceived.

The judgment is affirmed.Affirmed.Page 112