Opinion · Txlaw Texas

PETERS v. BROWN, 58 S.W.2d 1063 (Tex.Civ.App.-Ft. Worth 1933)

58 S.W.2d 1063

Type
Opinion
Court
Txlaw Texas
Jurisdiction
Txlaw
Date
1933-01-21
Topic
general

PETERS v. BROWN, 58 S.W.2d 1063 (Tex.Civ.App.-Ft. Worth 1933) PETERS v. BROWN et al.[fn*] No. 12763.Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. January 21, 1933.Rehearing Denied February 25, 1933. [fn*] Writ of error granted.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETERS v. BROWN, 58 S.W.2d 1063 (Tex.Civ.App.-Ft. Worth 1933). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETERS v. BROWN,58 S.W.2d 1063(Tex.Civ.App.-Ft. Worth 1933)
PETERS v. BROWN et al.fn*
No. 12763.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.
January 21, 1933.
Rehearing Denied February 25, 1933.
Error from Tarrant County Court; P. J. Small, Judge.

Suit by Mrs. C. B. Brown and another against C. C. Peters and another. To review a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, named defendant brings error.

Reversed and remanded.
M. Kleberg, of Fort Worth, for plaintiff in error.

Tom McMurray and Arthur Lee Moore, both of Fort Worth, for defendants in error.
DUNKLIN, Justice.
This suit was instituted by Mrs. C. B. Brown and Joe A. Vera against C. C. Peters and the D. V. Brooks Company to recover a balance of $230 due on certain promissory notes and to foreclose a chattel mortgage lien on a certain automobile. But there was no allegation as to the value of the machine, which is necessary to invoke the jurisdiction of the court. By reason of that error, the general demurrer to the petition should have been sustained.

For the reasons given in the opinion in the case of D. V. Brooks Co. v. Mrs. Joe A. Vera et al. (Tex.Civ.App.)58 S.W.2d 1061, this day filed, which is adopted as the opinion in this case, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded.
  1. Writ of error granted. ↩