Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Parker v. Tax Commission

278 U.S. 566

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1928-11-19
Topic: general

Per. Curiam: The writs of error are dismissed for want of a properly presénted substantial -federal question, on the authority of (1) St. Louis & San Francisco R. R. Co. v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Parker v. Tax Commission. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 5 opinions

Per. Curiam:

The writs of error are dismissed for want of a properly presénted substantial -federal question, on the authority of (1) St. Louis & San Francisco R. R. Co. v. Shephard, 240 U. S. 240; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City *567 of Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1; (2) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Ry., 228 U. S. 326; Marvin v. Trout, 199 U. S. 212.

Mr. Horace Andrews, with whom Messrs. Marion V. Semple and T. G. Thompson were on the brief, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Virgil H. Gibbs, with whom Mr. Edward C. Turner was on the brief, for defendants in error.