Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Crowson v. Cody

Crowson v. Cody, 267 U.S. 579 (1925)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1925-03-02
Topic
general

Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6; Ireland v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Crowson v. Cody. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6; Ireland v. Woods, 246 U. S. 323, 328; Stadelman v. Miner, 246 U. S. 544, 546; Chicago Great Western R. R. Co. v. Basham, 249 U. S. 164, 165; Citizens’ Bank v. Opperman, 249 U. S. 448, 450. (See 266 U. S. 590.)