Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Richardson v. Reno
526 U.S. 1142
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1999-06-01
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- “Although judicially developed exhaustion requirements might be waived for discretionary reasons by courts, statutorily created exhaustion requirements bind the parties and the courts.”
- “IIRIRA also altered the rules for permanent resident aliens returning from abroad . . . . [The] new INA § 101(a)(13)(c
- “Congress acts well within its plenary power in mandating detention of a criminal alien with an aggravated felony conviction facing removal proceedings”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Richardson v. Reno. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 25 opinions
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm., 525 U. S. 471 (1999).